Federal Judge Under Fire for Handling of Deportation Case
Investigative journalist Julie Kelly recently exposed troubling details from a court hearing involving the deportation of violent immigrants without papers.. The hearing centered around the Trump administration’s use of the Alien Enemies Act to remove criminals from the U.S.
Judge Challenges Deportations Ordered by Trump Officials
Judge James Boasberg is reviewing whether Trump officials broke court orders during these deportation efforts. The judge may even consider contempt charges. These officials had already deported over 100 individuals, including gang members and violent offenders.
Temporary Order Halts Deportation Flights
Last month, Boasberg blocked deportations by issuing a temporary restraining order (TRO). He labeled the Trump policy “problematic” and extended the order again. He claimed plaintiffs needed more time to prepare legal arguments against the administration.
Reporter Reveals Judge May Have Sought the Case
Julie Kelly shared new insights from a court transcript obtained last week. She believes Judge Boasberg deliberately positioned himself to preside over this immigration case.
“He wanted this case,” Kelly posted. “He wanted to stop the deportations and set up a contempt trap.”
Questionable Comments Raise Eyebrows
During a Zoom hearing on March 15, Boasberg apologized for his casual clothes. He said he had been “away” and lacked his robe. Kelly noted that he seemed aware of the case in advance, raising doubts about the random assignment process.
Judge Accused of Undermining Executive Authority
According to PJ Media, Boasberg’s actions suggest a push to override Trump’s authority in immigration and foreign policy. Julie Kelly agrees. She says this isn’t judicial balance—it’s interference in presidential duties.
Emergency Action Blocked Deportations Mid-Flight
On March 15, as ICE began deportations, Boasberg moved fast. He converted the lawsuit into a class-action case and issued a second restraining order. He even demanded that aircraft return to the U.S. mid-flight—a rare and controversial action.
One set of exchanges during Thursday's hearing I believed was way out of line for Boasberg was his interrogation of DOJ atty Drew Ensign over which Trump officials were listening to the 5pm hearing on March 15.
— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) April 5, 2025
On what basis can he demand those answers? pic.twitter.com/8wrNN766Y0
Judge Demands Info on Trump Officials in Hearing
The transcript also reveals an odd moment. Boasberg asked a Department of Justice attorney which Trump officials were listening to the hearing. Kelly criticized this question, calling it unnecessary and intrusive.
Judge Assigned to Multiple Trump-Related Cases
Boasberg currently oversees four lawsuits linked to Trump-era policies. Federal courts usually assign cases at random to prevent bias. Kelly and others question whether Boasberg has influenced the system.
Growing Concerns About Fairness and Transparency
Critics argue that Boasberg’s involvement in multiple high-profile cases could point to a pattern. They fear judicial impartiality is being compromised.
More updates will follow as this developing story continues to unfold.
About The Author
